Thermal Considerations for the Pentium® III processor
12
3.5.5 Airflow results
From the diagrams shown in the Airflow tests Section 3.5.1 it can be seen that the Average
Airflow for Chassis 1 is 79 LFM for probe 1 and 92 LFM for probe 2, whereas the Average
Airflow for Chassis 2 is 115 LFM and 103 LFM respectively. These averages are based on the
airflow for all 5 of the heatsinks tested. This effectively highlights the effect of using the same
heatsink in differing chassis. Both of the chassis had a similar internal layout but as shown in
Table 2-1 System configuration, they used different PSU’s.
For all heatsinks tested chassis 2 produced the lower Tjunction readings this reflects the higher
average airflow through this chassis.
Average Tjunction for all 5 Heatsinks
88ºC
79ºC
The shape and design of the heatsink will have a marked effect on the airflow pattern seen. For
example in chassis 1, one heatsink design, horizontal finned with ducting, gave 140 LFM for
probe 1 and 84 LFM for probe 2. Where a vertical finned under the fan with 45º fin’s either side,
heatsink gave 21 LFM and 124 LFM. Similar results were seen for chassis 2.
3.5.6 Heatsink Mechanics
The design of the heatsink will play an important part in the overall thermal solution of the
system. There are 2 basic heatsink shapes used for the Pentium® III Processor, Horizontal finned
and Vertical finned. Also there are various thermal interface materials (TIM) used by the different
heatsink manufacturers.
In separate tests it was found that for low profile systems (micro (µ) NLX etc.) the horizontal finned
heatsink out performs the vertical. For ATX chassis as used for these tests neither horizontal of
vertical finned heatsinks showed any discernable advantage over the other. The main difference
noted was the interaction of the heatsink fan exhaust with the chassis airflow and the effect on the
processor Tjunction temperature. See Section 3.5.5.
As an extreme example of the problems caused by using a poorly specified heatsink with very low
thermal conductance TIM, a test was carried out in chassis 1. The active heatsink used was a
Pentium® II heatsink designed to fit on the Tplate of the Pentium® II processor. An interposer was
designed to adapt this heatsink to the Pentium® III OLGA package. When assembled the processor
core was touching the TIM of the interposer the interposer was touching the TIM of the active part
of the heatsink.
From cold it only required 34 seconds for the processor Tjunction temperature to reach 127ºC, the
limit of the Maxim test equipment in use. The Tjunction temperature maximum specification is 80ºC.
This heatsink is a real, currently available heatsink.
The type of TIM used by the heatsink manufacturer is a very important part of the heatsink
specification, in the tests carried out a difference of 15ºC was noted on one heatsink, if the pressure