9
Figure 11 is the timing diagram of a typical parallel data
application with both the clock and the data lines being
sent through optocouplers. The gure shows data and
clock signals at the inputs and outputs of the optocou-
plers. To obtain the maximum data transmission rate, both
edges of the clock signal are being used to clock the data;
if only one edge were used, the clock signal would need
to be twice as fast.
Propagation delay skew represents the uncertainty of
where an edge might be after being sent through an
optocoupler. Figure 11 shows that there will be uncer-
tainty in both the data and the clock lines. It is important
that these two areas of uncertainty not overlap, otherwise
the clock signal might arrive before all of the data outputs
have settled, or some of the data outputs may start to
change before the clock signal has arrived.
From these considerations, the absolute minimum pulse
width that can be sent through optocouplers in a paral-
lel application is twice tPSK. A cautious design should use
a slightly longer pulse width to ensure that any additional
uncertainty in the rest of the circuit does not cause a prob-
lem.
The tPSK specied optocouplers oer the advantages of
guaranteed specications for propagation delays, pulse-
width distortion and propagation delay skew over the
recommended temperature, and power supply ranges.
Optocoupler CMR performance
The principal protection against common mode noise
comes down to the fundamental isolation properties of
the optocoupler, this in turn is directly related to the input-
output leakage capacitance of the optocoupler.
To provide maximum protection to circuitry connected to
the input or output of the optocoupler the leakage capac-
itance is minimized by having large separation distances
at all points in the optocoupler construction, including
the LED/photodiode interface.
In addition to the constructional design, additional circuit
design steps are taking to further mitigate the eects of
common mode noise. The most important of these is the
use of a Faraday shield on the photodetector stage. This
faraday shield is eective in optocouplers because the in-
ternal modulation frequency (light) is many orders of mag-
nitude higher than the common mode noise frequency.
Application level CMR Performance
In application, it desirable that the optocoupler’s common
mode isolation perform as close as possible to that indi-
cated in the data sheets specications.
The rst step in meeting this goal is to ensure maintain-
ing maximum separation between PCB interconnects on
either side of the optocoupler and avoid routing tracks
beneath the optocoupler. Nonetheless, it is inevitable that
a certain amount of CMR noise will be coupled into the
inputs which can potentially result in false-triggering of
the input.
This problem is frequently observed in devices with in-
put high input impedence such as CMOS buered inputs
in either optocoupler or alternate isolator technologies.
In some cases, this not only causes momentary missing
pulses but in some technologies may even cause input
circuitry to latch-up.
The ACNT-H61L does not face input latch up issue even
at very high CMR levels, such as those experienced in end
equipment level tests (for example IEC 61000-4-4) due to
the simple diode structure of the LED.
In some cases achieving the rated data sheet CMR perfor-
mance levels is not possible in the intended application,
often because of the practical need to actually connect
the isolator input to the output of a dynamically chang-
ing signal rather than tying the input statically to VDD1
or GND1.
This specsmanship issue is often observable with alterna-
tive isolators utilizing AC encoding techniques.
To address this requirement for clear transparency
on the achievable end application performance, the
ACNT-H61L optocoupler includes an additional typi-
cal performance indication of the dynamic CMR in the
electrical parameter table. What this information indi-
cates is the achievable CMR performance whilst the in-
put is being toggled on or o during the occurrence of
a CMR transient. The logic output of the optocoupler
is mainly controlled by the level of the LED current due
to the short transition rise/fall time of the LED current
(approximately 10ns), the dynamic noise immunity is
essentially the same as the static noise immunity.
To achieve this goal of meeting the maximum inherent
CMR capabilities some simple consideration needs to be
given to the operation of the LED at the application level.
In particular ensuring that the LED stays either on or o
during a CMR transient.
Some common design techniques which are sometimes
used to meet this goal:
Keeping LED On:
i) Overdrive the LED with a higher than required forward
current.
Keeping LED O:
i) Reverse bias the LED during the o state.
ii) Minimize the o state impedance across the anode and
cathode of the LED during the o state.
All these methods are fully capability of enabling the full
CMR capabilities o the ACNT-H61L to be achieved. But
they do come at the cost of practical implementation is-
sues or a compromise on power consumption.
An eective method to meet the goal of maintaining the
LED status during a CMR event with no other design com-
promises other the addition of a single low cost compo-
nent (resistor).